A totally biased and unreasonable list of blogs that I think you might enjoy reading, which expands on the list in the sidebar of my own blog.

I reserve the right to add or remove any site from this blogroll at any time, for any reason or no reason at all, because it is my blogroll.

For an exhaustive list of Virginia political blogs, see BlogNetNews.

Faisal Gill draws over 100 supporters

As I said before, there were over 100 people at the Faisal Gill campaign kickoff, and plenty of food. The speeches were excellent.

I had heard there would be protesters. Some people who claim Faisal and his supporters are terrorists were going to show up and picket his event. So, I took pictures of the protesters, as you can see here:

Oh well. Maybe next time.

Bill Bolling noted the impressive size of the crowd, and congratulated Faisal for getting so many people out for his kickoff. He talked briefly about all the candidates for office, and then spoke directly about Faisal. He opened by noting that he was not there to be against the other candidate, and said we had two excellent candidates. I appreciated that, and wish we could all adopt the attitude of speaking FOR our candidates instead of trashing the opponents.

Then he endorsed Faisal. He said why he felt so strongly about Faisal. He noted that Faisal is not a politician, but is a family man. We need people who understand the pressure that families are under, good schools, safe streets, and low taxes - and Faisal understands those concerns.

He called Faisal a Patriot, noting his service both in the Navy and in the department of Homeland Security. He notes that Faisal can reach out to different parts of our community, different ethnic groups, but he is first and foremost a patriot and an American.

He told us Faisal Gill is a true-blue conservative, the kind we need in Richmond. Calling Faisal a fiscal conservative, Bill said Gill understands the need to keep government small and focused, to keep taxes low, and to create a pro-business environment. Faisal understands the importance of individual rights. Bill also called Faisal a social conservative, who is pro-life, and pro-2nd-amendment.

But most importantly, Bill Bolling said Faisal Gill was his friend. He spoke of how Faisal stood by him during his campaign, noting there were only a few people who were with him from the beginning, and Faisal was one of his strongest allies. All the endorsers made this same comment about their friendship with Gill and his hardworking commitment to them when they needed him.
Ken Cuccinelli spoke next, He told of how Faisal worked tirelessly to help Ken win his election, crediting Faisal for his victory. Ken then noted to his common ground with Faisal on smaller government, which means less regulations and less taxes. Ken talked about 2nd amendment issues, the right to bear arms as an individual right. Ken asked us to support Faisal to help Scott and Ken protect our constitutional rights. He spoke of the unborn, and Faisal's strong pro-life credentials. He closed by saying
"those are fights that aren't going away. Fights for the unborn, fights to protect our constitutional rights, and to reign in government. That is a constant battle. It always wants to grow, it always wants to invade your life, and it always will, unless you elect people like Faisal Gill to reign in that monster that is government".

After Ken's speech, Corey introduced Scott Lingamfelter. He good-naturedly questioned why Faisal would choose to follow Scott, calling him a hard act to follow.

Scott gave a great, rousing speech, which I won't excerpt for a while, because I'm taking a break.


But I was most impressed by Faisal Gill himself. I didn't know what to expect, having only heard him in short speeches at the committee meetings. This guy can speak. He is forceful, clear, and speaks with conviction on the issues that are important to our community.


And listening to Gill, it is clear he won't back down when he gets to Richmond and the influence of the "good old boys". It's one thing to be able to voice the correct positions on issues. It's another to have displayed the conviction and determination to fight for what you believe in when others are fighting back, as Gill demonstrated in his debate on the Marriage Amendment in Fairfax last fall. I note Gill stood strong in the face of false allegations of wrongdoing in 2004 as well, when a lesser man might have quit, he stood his ground and cleared his name before he would leave for private practice.


Faisal touched on a broad range of issues during his 20+ minute speech. He did so with few notes. He moved well, he spoke directly and convincingly. His positions on most issues were strongly conservative, and showed a commitment to doing the right thing for the district.

Again, I'll post highlights of the speech at a future date, as I am tired and will be taking a break to get away from the scurrilous charges of people which I feel are dragging me down to their level.

It was informative listening to Bill Bolling, Ken Cucinnelli, and Scott Lingamfelter delivering long and heartfelt endorsements of Faisal Gill, both as people who support his policies and philosophy, but also as friends who vouch for his impeccable character and fine services to our country both in civilian and military capacities.

If you live in this district, I urge you to pay close attention to Faisal, and if you like what you see and hear, to sign up to be a convention delegate for Faisal Gill, a man who would be a fine representative for the 51st district.


Worst of the Worst - Part Deux


One of the venal terrorist from Guantanamo has been brought to justice. America can now collectively breathe a sigh of relief.

David Hicks was tried and found guilty by the war crimes tribunal in Guantanamo and sentenced to seven years in prison. Oh but wait, the sentence was later reduced under a plea agreement to nine months.

Well, here are some thoughts from Devilstower of DailyKos on the plea agreement and what it could mean:

What kind of deal had Hicks made? Did he offer to provide the names of hidden terrorists in the United States? Did he reveal Osama's secret hiding place? Did he help foil one of those vaguely-defined plots Bush is always alluding to?

Just what could a man who supposedly was involved in plotting attacks against the west both with the Taliban and al Qaeda have to offer? His silence.
Of course...

Under the plea agreement Hicks has to keep his trap shut for at least 12 months, the New York Times reports.

[T]o some in the courtroom, the proceedings proved only that the system was rigged [and] the only way out of Guantánamo was to give the prosecutors what they wanted...Hicks plead guilty [and] signed a plea bargain in which he recanted his accusations about being abused in detention and promised not to speak to reporters for a year.

In the courtroom, the military judge had Mr. Hicks acknowledge each of the contentious provision of his deal. Mr. Hicks, the judge read, agreed that he had “never been illegally treated” while in American captivity, including “through the entire period of your detention by the United States at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.” Mr. Hicks agreed to that statement.

Yes sir, boss man. Anything to get me out of this hell hole. Of course, that doesn't commit his Australian lawyer from telling the truth once Mr. Hicks safely arrives home. He was quoted voicing his opinion on what Hicks might be thinking about this sordid ghastly affair:
“He says that if he is the worst of the worst, and the person who should be put before a military commission first,” Mr. McLeod said, “then the world really hasn’t got much to worry about.”

Under the terms of his release, Hicks must never profit from his story; and if he ever decides to write a book, the profits must go to the Australian government.

But oh hell, Howling Latina can see a loophole as wide as the Pacific Ocean on these transparent restrictions that are meant to silence history. The gag order ain't on mom, sis or Uncle Lawyer, right?!? Besides, it looks like the foreign press already knows exactly what the scoop on this piece of poop is, even in Australia.

Legalized abortion in Mexico

Mexico City may soon legalize abortion making it the first entity in Latin America to overcome the influence of the Roman Catholic Church on this controversial issue. It will be recognition that abortion is already commonly practiced but unregulated.

This from the New York Times via the International Herald Tribune:

Dominated by liberals, Mexico City’s egislature is expected to legalize abortion in a few weeks. The bill would make this city one of the largest entities in Latin America to break with a long tradition of women resorting to illegal clinics and midwives to end unwanted pregnancies.
But the measure has stirred a vicious debate and shaken this heavily Roman Catholic country to its roots. In recent days, the bill has dominated conversations from family dinner tables to the president’s office. Celebrities and politicians of all stripes have lined up on both sides, throwing verbal darts at one another. Catholic and feminist groups have staged dueling protests and marches.
The contours of the debate are familiar to veterans of similar battles in the United States. But Mexico City’s law would be groundbreaking in Latin America, where most countries allow abortion only under strict conditions, like when the life of the mother is in danger or when she is a victim of rape or incest. Only in Cuba, Puerto Rico and Guyana can women have abortions for any reason during the first trimester. Three countries — Chile, Nicaragua and El Salvador — ban it without exception.
The Mexico City bill would make it legal to have an abortion during the first trimester for any reason. The procedure would be free at city health facilities. Private hospitals would be required to provide an abortion to any woman who asks for one, though doctors with religious or ethical objections would not be required to perform abortions.
Catholic leaders and church officials have denounced the proponents as “baby killers” and have warned that the law could provoke violence against doctors who agree to provide the service. A group of Catholic lawyers are pushing for a citywide referendum on the issue, hoping to avert the vote in the city Legislative Assembly.
The debate in Mexico threatens to revive tensions between President Felipe Calderón, a conservative who opposes abortion, and the leftist Party of the Democratic Revolution, whose candidate narrowly lost the election last year and still refuses to concede.
Calderón has tried to stay above the fray, but he said last week, “I am in defense of life.” His health minister and other surrogates in the conservative National Action Party, however, are in the thick of it. They have proposed streamlining adoption laws, improving sex education and providing subsidies to unwed mothers as alternatives.
Leftists and feminists, meanwhile, have accused opponents of turning a blind eye to reality. They say millions of women here, and indeed throughout much of Latin America, already ignore the law and choose to abort fetuses, often in dingy underground clinics or the private homes of midwives. They risk infection, sterility and sometimes death.
“Women are dying, above all poor women, because of unsafe abortions,” said María Consuelo Mejía, the director of Catholics for the Right to Decide. “What we would like is that these women never have to confront the necessity of an abortion, but in this society it’s impossible right now. There is no access to information, to contraceptives. Nor do most women have the power to negotiate the use of contraceptives with their partners.”
****
Many women here are watching the political battle with a mix of trepidation and hope. Like many laws in Mexico, the abortion law is honored as much in its breach as its observance.
Government officials estimate at least 110,000 women a year seek illegal abortions in Mexico, and many abortion rights groups say the number is much higher. At least 88 women died in 2006 from botched abortions, the Health Ministry says, though it is far from clear that all cases were reported.
For the well off, it is common knowledge that certain gynecologists perform illegal abortions in private hospitals, disguising the procedure as something else on documents.
For the poor, unwanted pregnancies often mean finding a midwife or an underground clinic, abortion rights advocates say. Some young women also resort to huge doses of drugs for arthritis and gastritis, available over the counter, that can cause miscarriages. Others use teas made from traditional herbs to cause miscarriages. All of these methods carry dangers.

You may read the complete article here.

ERIC LUNDBERG RESIGNS AT WEDDING

Too Conservative has more details.

This is a major loss for the GOP- Eric Lundberg had been all that held local Republicans together.

VAYD Results

Adam Sharp did an amazing job live-blogging the VAYD Convention, here are some snipits:

John Alex Golden (Arlington) is the next VAYD president! (Dom was gracious enough to remind me that Erick received more votes than I did last year.)
Jennifer Bissett (Alexandria) is unopposed for Executive Vice President.
James “Skippy” Martin (University of Mary Washington) is unopposed for Vice President of Membership.
Mike Sizemore (Virginia Tech) is unopposed for Vice President of Political Action.
Ally McIntosh (William and Mary) is unopposed for Vice President of Communication.
Anthony Dale (Alexandria) is unopposed for Vice President of Finance.
Mark Turnbull (William & Mary Alumni) is unopposed for VAYD Secretary.
Andrew Almand (Arlington) is unopposed for a THIRD term as VAYD Treasurer.
John Taylor Chapman (Alexandria) is unopposed for National Committeeman. He’s going to blog!
‘Lil Amy” Lewis (Arlington) is unopposed for National Committeewoman.

Is Wardrup running or not?

Sources tell me Leo Wardrup was circulating petitions at this mornings Virginia Beach Republican breakfast.  Yet, 3 of his Republican colleagues in the House have told me he is retiring.  What's going on here?

A Change in Management

Well, sort of. Except not really.

We have seen the light, and it is beautiful. Dick Cheney is there, beckoning to us.

We cannot resist. Team Ditzy Democrats has crossed over to the RIGHT side. We can no longer call ourselves Democrat because of the inner strife, turmoil and thin skinned Communists that contaminate the Democrat(ICK) Par-tay.

We are Rockstar Republicans. Now, and forever more.

Candidate for Clerk interrogated and released by the State Police

Earlier this evening on my way to work I was pulled over by a state trooper for an “exhaust issue”.  The stop then turned into “farm use vehicle issue”.

I found myself explaining to the trooper how running a Geo Storm between farms is more profitable than running a 12 mile to the gallon pickup truck.

It didn’t seem to bother him that I had no liscense with me and I never gave him my name, just my father’s.

Truth be told, as he said, he just wanted to make sure I wasn’t some “illegal guru” putting “farm use” tags on a Honda to go to work at the poultry plant…..

Faisal Gill’s Impressive Campaign Kickoff

I don't usually attend campaign events, but I decided to head down to Faisal Gill's kickoff because I had heard there would be protesters and I thought it might be fun. His event was held at the American Legion post down in the district -- I took a picture of their sign, I hope I don't get hauled away an improper image in a campaign blog.

I got there pretty early, so I was able to find a space in the lot. I parked next to a friendly-looking car with a nice set of bumper stickers:


Since I had some free time, I wanted to talk to people I hadn't met before. So I asked Denny Daugherty, and he introduced me to Grover Norquist, who isn't that tall so I enjoyed our chat because I didn't have to strain my neck. I also met Suhail Khan, who worked in the White House and for Rep. Tom Campbell of California. And I shook hands with the great Morton Blackwell, Virginia's RNC representative and member of the executive committee. (from left: Suhail, Grover, David Ray, Morton, and Denny)

Grover and I discussed blogging in Virginia at some length, as well as the various attacks being made on Faisal Gill regarding his association with Suhail and Grover. It was good to be able to talk directly with those involved and get the "other side of the story". I've often found that reality is not what you read, and this was no exception.

A little later, State Senator Ken Cuccinelli and Lt. Governor Bill Bolling came over and took Grover from me. But they were nice enough to let me take their picture. (In case you are wondering, not, I never got any pictures of myself at the event. You'll have to take my word for it that I was there).
(left/right: Ken, Bill, Grover)


Scott Lingamfelter was there, and I caught him in a spirited discussion with State Senate candidate Bob Fitzsimmonds. Both Scott and Bob have endorsed Faisal Gill, and Scott was there to give an endorsement speech and to rally the troops. Bob was there to lend support and clap. I have more pictures of Scott where you can see his face. (left/right: Scott, Bob)

There was a lot of great food at the event. I didn't spend a lot of time eating early on, as I was talking and taking pictures. I did take a plateful of food with me at the end. Here's some pictures of the food tables (I never did get to the cookie plate):

I also got a chance to chat with current Delegate and Clerk of Court candidate Michelle McQuigg, who was sitting up on the stage. I asked about her support, and she said she would be voting for Gill. She gave the speech that introduced Bill Bolling.

After people had had their chance to chat with each other and to eat some food and grab chairs at the tables, the main event began. PWC Board Chair Corey Stewart ran the event, and introduced the speakers.

(Left/Right: Michelle, Faisal, Corey, Bill, Ken, Scott)




By the time the speakers started talking, the parking lot was full and the room was pretty crowded. Before it was over I counted over 100 people in the room. I counted about a dozen times to be sure, and I got a different answer every time. I wish people would not move around while I'm trying to count.



Michelle spoke first, and as always she was well-received by the crowd. I've decided not to dwell on what people said because it's 1:30 am and I've got to get up early tomorrow. But there was a lot of clapping.

I recorded all the big speeches, although the recordings are very rough and hard to hear. I might try over the next week to cull some stuff out of them for posting, but probably not.






More to Come.



You can see all the pictures that I took and found worthy of posting at my Picture Web Site, under Faisal Gill Campaign Kickoff.

DHS has issued a new advisory system


Bert & Ernie Terror Level
Originally uploaded by Kier42.
Seems that the Department of Homeland Security has issued a new Homeland Security Advisory System. Just when I'd learned the old one; at least the colors haven't changed.

You’ve Never Seen Sausage Sight!

Last month an alert, loyal, and quite kosher Extreme Mortman reader brought to our attention Orthodox Jewish anger over Washington-area Dunkin’ Donuts establishments that once were Kosher-certified but had begun offering sausage and bacon.

Sunday’s Washington Post advances the story.

Extreme Mortman doesn’t keep kosher — but we do want to show solidarity with our Orthodox brethren engaged in this epic David and Goliath battle.  So as a symbolic measure, we’ll boycott all doughnuts during Passover.

Sleazy Political Hack At It Again

Over at BVBL, that "loyal Republican" hack, AWCheney, is at it again, attacking other Republicans. Here's what the OWW said:
Greg, how can you possibly suggest that “shared values” are more important than “personal integrity?” People lacking in personal integrity would have absolutely no problem sharing the values of each and every person to whom they speak, regardless of what those values might be. If you can’t trust them, how can you trust what they say?
Here comments were directed at the Republican nominee against Chuck Colgan, Bob FitzSimmonds, for daring to support principled Conservatives. I posted a comment, which Greg deleted, because it exposed an inconvenient truth about someone who regularly posts there and sucks up to him.

It was something to the effect that she was right. After all, how dare Greg give credence to someone who attempts to use the criminal justice system to attack Republican candidates, and then lies about his efforts. Oh, wait. That was AWCheney.

Of course, AWCheney knows a lot about "personal integrity," much in the same way that Bill Clinton knows a lot about veracity. One cannot be ignorant of a characteristic that one so clearly lacks.

Feminism and the Iranian crisis

Faye Turney was among the fifteen British sailors and marines seized by Iranian warships a week ago Friday for allegedly entering Iranian waters. They have been held captive ever since, paraded before television cameras and may face some sort of Iranian legal proceedings.

Setting aside for the moment the issues of the Iranian government’s allegations and treatment of these captives, it is interesting to consider the significance of a woman in this role being held captive in a country where women do not traditionally serve in this role.

Women in the military do represent, however imperfectly, progress women have made in society in general. Progress, by that measure, has been considerable in the West. According to the Independent, “In 1961 there were just 30,000 women in NATO uniforms; today there are more than 288,000.” It would be interesting to know how this compares to the role of women in a cross section of Muslim countries.

In Iran, there is a struggle between cosmopolitan elements of the population supporting some degree of modernism on the one hand and, on the other hand, reactionary forces led by clerics seeking to impose traditionalism that, among other things, limits the role of women in society. In the eyes of the Iranians as well as others around the world, Seaman Turney is not merely a Brit in uniform who finds herself in an unfortunate situation but woman in uniform equal to the men she serves with. She is a symbol of the best or the worst – depending on your point of view – of the modernism the West has come to represent.

This is Janice Turner’s assessment in the London Times:
What a perplexing and alien creature Seaman Turney must appear to this Iranian regime. A young woman working close-knit with men, proud to perform her dangerous task of piloting speedboats as well as any one of them. A wife and mother, moreover, away from her small daughter, who has put military career before marital and maternal duties.

The Iranians were satisfied to have her 14 male comrades surrender as sailors or Marines: Seaman Turney had to surrender also as a woman. While the men were free to eat their pitta bread and lamb stew with weary resignation, she had to work out how best to appear adequately humble, grateful and submissive. She must submit not just to Iran’s military authority but its patriarchal might.

After all, here she stood, the end-product of 100 years of bitterly fought — and now mostly unacknowledged — Western female emancipation. In Britain our own reactionaries may finger-wag at the unnatural spectacle of a mother in a warzone, distracting our male warrior caste. One strain of feminism can question why womankind — Nature’s peacemakers, oh Mother Gaia! — would want to fight men’s wars, particularly this one.

While another might point out the sham of Seaman Turney’s equality: the sexual harassment endured by almost all women military personnel and their ban from the front line.

And the tiresome buzz of these debates can distract us from the wholly magnificent truth: the freedom of Seaman Turney and of all of us, our right to make choices — and mistakes — to fight, to study, to work, to stay home, to have children, to remain childless, to wear what the hell we like — whether basque or burka — to live unenslaved by our fertility, our fathers, our husbands, to have equal rights before the law. So languid are we in this warm bath of freedom, that International Women’s Day — March 9 — doesn’t even figure on our calendar. It is some vestigial Seventies feminist joke. We’d be marching for what, exactly? Is there really anything left? Er, more women on the boards of FTSE 100 companies?

In Iran, however, International Women’s Day is as perilous as patrolling any Iraqi foxhole. A week before, to forestall protest on the day itself, police rounded up and arrested 33 women involved in the Campaign for Equality, which aims to get a million signatures on a petition calling for the end of discrimination in Iranian penal and family codes.

In Iran a woman’s testimony is worth half that of a man, her murder requires only half the punishment, girls as young as 9 may be stoned for adultery and mothers after divorce only have custody rights over their children until they reach 7 years old.

On March 9, the few women who dared to gather peacefully outside the parliament building were dispersed or arrested. Any prominent woman lawyer, journalist or politician speaks out at grave personal risk. Five feminist leaders are currently on trial for “propaganda against the system” and “acting against national security.” Compared with their subjugated Saudi sisters, Iranian women have comparative liberty, being permitted to drive, vote and stand for office. Indeed more than half of university graduates in Iran are women. And it is this weight of numbers, a growing confidence and sense of entitlement among these educated women, that threatens the male leadership and has precipitated a recent crackdown.
You can read her entire article here.

Where Baseball Meets Politics

(I originally wrote this as part of a bigger piece for MSNBC two years ago, when the Washington Nationals’ inaugural baseball season began.  Opening Day Sunday prompts me to run parts of it again now)

Even the most singularly focused political junkie must acknowledge the influence of baseball on politics.  President Bush was a managing partner of the Texas Rangers baseball team.  Ronald Reagan used to broadcast and re-enact baseball games on the radio.  Hall-of-fame pitcher Jim Bunning is a U.S. senator.  And who was that sitting next to Hillary Clinton during President Clinton’s 1999 State of the Union Address?  None other than Sammy Sosa, who made a repeat appearance last month in Congress, joining other Major League Baseball star players to discuss the problem of steroid use.  Fortunately for Washington baseball fans, Sosa is Peter Angelos’ problem now.  No wonder with Sosa, the Orioles are so-so.

President Bush this week throws out the opening pitch at RFK Stadium (only D.C. would name its ballpark after an attorney general), an act itself proving the intertwining of baseball and politics.  The president’s pitch resumes a tradition that began with William Howard Taft, who in 1910 tossed to the Senators’ Walter Johnson. (Here’s one for you baseball trivia lovers: Johnson pitched a shutout win, allowing the Philadelphia Athletics just one hit in a 3-0 victory for Washington. This year, the other Philadelphia team, the Phillies, beat Washington on opening day.)

Baseball’s Hall of Fame Web site describes the executive act this way: “The president’s annual appearance at the start of each season symbolically renews the bonds that unite the country, its leaders, and the game — a ceremonial springtime rebirth as America’s National Pastime. For presidents, baseball offers a welcome connection to a wholesome, all-American image.”

Sounds like a State of the Union address. Or the budget request.

Don’t forget: In 2001, President Bush threw out the first pitch at Game Three of the 2001 World Series at Yankee Stadium, weeks after the Sept. 11 attacks.   It was a warm, supportive crowd.  Surely April 14 will be equally friendly to the president — what with all those W’s on everyone’s cap.  But opening day presents this political sub-drama: The Nationals battle the Arizona Diamondbacks. That’s right, Arizona, as in John McCain.

Let there be little doubt who will be in the stands on Opening Day: Politicians.  Lots of politicians.  And the people who lobby politicians.  And the people who donate to them.    And the media celebs who cover them.  Better be careful getting angry at a player or umpire.  Yell out “Get rid of the bum!” and half the crowd will think you’re demanding a recall election.

The Washington Post reported on political and media heavy-hitters angling for the best seats in RFK stadium: “Major League Baseball is returning to Washington after a 34-year absence, but the game of connections and status never left town. So for months, VIPs from business, politics and the media have been working to get choice tickets to Nationals games.”

Yes, along with patriotism, there’s status.  Political status.

“One of the things that Washington has is many people who define themselves as being important,” team President Tony Tavares told the Washington Post about ticket requests. “There are very few people that don’t define themselves as being important in Washington.”

That’s politics for ya.  Everyone’s important.

Of the old Washington Senators, it used to be said: “First in war, first in peace, last in the American League.”  Of our new baseball team we can add, “And always in politics.”

President Bush baseball Washington Nationals By Ricky Carioti, The Washington Post Photo

(Photo Credit: By Ricky Carioti — The Washington Post Photo)

93rd House District

Outlook: Likely Republican

Phil Hamilton's 93rd district is based overwhelmingly in the Democratic City of Newport News.  While Hamilton does not have the overwhelmingly Democratic precincts (which go to Delegate Mamie Bacote) he does have a fairly solid Democratic district.  In fact, the numbers here are very similar to the district I live in here in south-central Fairfax, with tiny GOP victories for President and the Marriage Amendment, but much larger Democratic victories in the other elections.

In the Presidential election, George W. Bush squeaked out a 12,853-12,597 vote victory in this district. That margin was thanks the the only two precincts in this district not in Newport News- but instead in James City County where Bush won 2,243-1,489.  Kerry won the Newport News side by a 11,108-10,610 count.

In the Governor's election Tim Kaine romped here by a count of 7,644-5,599.  With the James City County precincts voting 1,266-1,230 the entire margin came out of Newport News- a count of 6,378-4,369.

George Allen won the James City County precincts 1,634-1,429 but was swamped in the Newport News precincts by a 7,826-6,021 count. Downballot the marriage amendment did much better overall but the results were interesting.  The James City County precincts that were much more GOP upballot voted "No" by a count of 1,450-1,587, while the more Democratic Newport News precincts voted "Yes" by a count of 7,676-6,231

The Democratic performance of this district is what keeps Hamilton from being safe, but he is a very strong incumbent.  It will be interesting to see if the Democrats even field a candidate to take on this challenge.

93rd District Results

George W. Bush 12,853 (50.5%)- John Kerry 12,597 (49.5%)
Jerry Kilgore 5,599 (42.3%) - Tim Kaine 7,644 (57.7%)
George Allen 7,655 (45.3%) - Jim Webb 9,255 (54.7%)
Yes on Marriage 9,126 (53.9%) - No on Marriage 7,818 (46.1%)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

March 7th-  Bob Marshall v. Bruce Roemmelt (Outlook:  Likely GOP)
March 8th-  Tom Rust v. Jay Donahue (Outlook:  Likely GOP)
March 9th-  John Welch v. Bobby Mathieson (Outlook:  Leans GOP)
March 10th-  Dave Hunt v. Margi Vanderhye v. Rip Sullivan (Outlook:  Slight-Lean DEM)
March 11th-  Bill Carrico v. Susie Garner (Outlook:  Safe GOP)
March 12th-  Ben Cline v. ??? (Outlook:  Safe GOP)
March 13th-  Joe May v. Marty Martinez (Outlook:  Likely GOP)
March 14th-  Danny Marshall v. Adam Tomer (Outlook:  Leans GOP)
March 19th:  Jeff Frederick v. Chris Brown (Outlook:  Slight-Lean GOP)
March 31st:  Rob Bell v. ??? (Outlook:  Likely GOP)
March 31st:  Phil Hamilton v. ??? (Outlook:  Likely GOP)
April 1st:  Tim Hugo v. Morris Meyer v. Rex Simmons (Outlook:  Likely GOP)
April 1st:  Watkins Abbitt v. Connie Brennan (Outlook:  Leans GOP)
April 2nd:  Bob Purkey v. Bob Maciver (Outlook: Likely GOP)
April 3rd:  ??? v. Eric Ferguson (Outlook:  Slight-Lean GOP)
April 4th:  Dave Albo v. Kate Wilder (Outlook:  Likely Republican)
April 5th:  Leo Wardrup v. Joe Bouchard (Outlook: Likely Republican)
April 6th:  Anne Crockett-Stark v. ??? (Outlook:  Likely Republican)
April 7th:  Faisal Gill v. Julie Lucas v. ??? (Outlook:  Slight-Lean GOP)
April 8th:  ??? v. ??? (Open Robert Hurt seat)(Outlook:  Likely Republican)
 

Protest at Harris Teeter at Ballston Commons

A coalition of local officials, union members, religious leaders, and students held an informational picket line in front of the Ballston Commons Harris Teeter in Arlington today at 11 a.m.  Among those Virginia politicians in attendance, who lent support to labor, were state delegates Kris Amundson, Vivian Watts and Mark Sickles. The protest lasted about an hour and about 70 participants heard from speakers about deplorable working conditions at the Smithfield pork processing plant in Tar Heel, North Carolina.
The first thing that was pointed out was that some of Smithfield's plants are unionized and have decent working conditions.  The problem is that as Smithfield expands and buys up non-union plants, especially in right to work states, the company actively fights unions and engages in union busting activities.  One of the most egregious plants where this has occurred is the one in Tar Heel, North Carolina, whose terrible working conditions spurred today's protest action.  You can read a description of it here.

A bigger problem is that whenever they are in an area where they are successful in their union busting, Smithfield also mistreats its employees.  Among the charges leveled against the company is that it does nothing to help prevent workers from developing repetitive stress injuries, a common ailment among meat processing workers, it doesn't carry workers compensation, which is illegal, and it does not provide health insurance for its employees.  When workers develop painful injuries like Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, or if they have job-related accidents that incapacitate them, the company simply fires them.  And these are people who make minimum wage and can least afford to lose their jobs.

At the Tar Heel plant workers have had to endure unsanitary conditions, including lack of safe drinking water, lack of hot water and soap to wash their hands, and generally unsafe working conditions.

Although the company claims that it is willing to let workers vote on a union, they have used intimidation tactics including firing workers and accusing them of providing false personal information such as fake social security numbers, and not giving them enough time to verify their personal data.  They've been responsible for federal immigration raids in their plants to scare workers silent.  The company has a long-term history of interfering with a fair election process, and it lost a case in the federal appeals court a decade ago for meddling in a union election and they had to pay $1.1 million plus interest to workers who had been fired in that dispute.

The group protesting these conditions leafleted passers-by and presented information to Harris Teeter's store manager urging him to not carry Smithfield products. 

This was part of a national effort and Harris Teeter stores were specifically targeted in picket lines across the country.  Harris Teeter is also North Carolina based and is one of the largest retailers to carry Smithfield products, often under their own store name.

For more information, you can go here to an article in the Houston Chronicle about the union organizing effort and the conditions at Smithfield plants.

Michelle McQuigg Backs Faisal Gill

That is the word I got from someone I know who was at Gill's announcement tonight. I also heard the tunrout was pretty good. This is big for Gill, who seems to have the established conservatives lining up behind hm, as well as popular Supervisors Covington and May, as well as Cuccinelli and Lingamfelter AND Bill Bolling.

I know what BVBL has been posting on, but there has to be something for Faisal Gill if good conservatives like Bolling, Cuccinelli, Lingamfelter, Covington, and May AND McQuigg are all backing him.

Next stop Iran? A downward spiral is at hand


iraq
Originally uploaded by soldiersmediacenter.
There is talk in the blogosphere that the U.S. has a military operation in place to take on Iran and Iran’s nuclear endeavors. Called Operation Bite, the Russian media reports that the US has plans, along with an implementation dated, to bomb twenty targets in Iran. The talk is that this will be an air war only, striking at Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

Now, I’m not sure that the Russian media and the blogosphere are on-the-mark with this. I have severe doubts that an operation such of this would be leaked through the Russian media. I place nearly no credence in the reports.

But it has gotten me thinking. Sure, I’m certain we have war plans and contingency plans and crisis plans in place for a move on Iraq. Had we not, I’d say the military isn’t doing their job. It is the job of planners to have, on-the-shelf, all sorts of plans. And, frankly, I’m more than okay with that.

Deploying that sort of plan now… well, I do have an issue with that.

Some readers will likely assert that there is a similarity between Iran now and Germany of the 1930’s. Some people would suggest that if we had moved against Hitler and Germany before 1940, millions of lives would have been saved.

Well, hindsight is an amazing thing, isn’t it.

What if we had gone nuclear against Russia and Cuba during the crisis of 1962. Hindsight says that would have been the wrong move. Again, hindsight is an amazing thing.

With the Cuban Missile Crisis, President Kennedy made the right move, and a move that was not necessarily the move recommended by his advisors, many of whom were avid hawks. Thankfully, Kennedy’s cooler head prevailed.

History is littered with such incidents.

We are now at a place in history, however, where cool heads, I suggest, are not prevailing. Was it necessary, truly necessary, to invade Iraq and depose Saddam Hussein? From my vantage point, I’d have to suggest no. We achieved our outright military goal, but the accompanying political goal was not, and likely will never, be accomplished.

I’m not found of unfounded overseas adventures. When things are black and white, such as in Iraq I, sure, move forward. But, when things are gray, time, take time. Allow the other elements of DIME to achieve the political purpose.

What of Iran?

Well, if this coming Saturday proves the Russian media and the blogosphere to be correct, I predict we are more than a little ways in on a long, downward spiral.

Bush Hams It Up Over Pork

Credit President Bush with trying out a new weapon against runaway Congressional spending: stand-up comedy.

Here’s Bush earlier this week:

There’s $3.5 million for visitors to tour the Capitol and see for themselves how Congress works.

And here’s Bush in Saturday’s radio address:

The Democrats loaded up their bills with billions of dollars in domestic spending completely unrelated to the war …$74 million for secure peanut storage. I like peanuts as much as the next guy, but I believe the security of our troops should come before the security of our peanut crop.

If Congress keeps spending money this way, the President’s speeches might soon require a two-drink minimum.

Lundberg Resigns

Too Conservative is reporting that FCRC Chairman Eric Lundberg has resigned.  I’ve spoken with Eric several times and found him to be a talented and dedicated, but extremely busy man who was truly an asset to Fairfax Republicans.  His departure from the Chairman’s position in the FCRC is going to leave a big hole to fill, but fortunately the FCRC isn’t short at all on leadership talent.

I wonder if Nick Meads is going to step up.  He’d be a good pick.